Why not get ahead of the curve?
It's nice to imagine building a big, shiny future. But there's some un-sexy work to do first.
After a while, it was hard to remember why we'd drawn the lines to begin with.
Our future is increasingly made worse by a refusal to cooperate.
The power to control ever-greater amounts of energy is a hallmark of civilization’s progress, and humanity is poised to take the next big step.
I'm sure you have questions.
The Future Library Project is collecting books that won’t be published in our lifetime.
AI futurists assume that faster thinking automatically produces greater intelligence, leading to a Singularity of transcendent machine minds. But speed is the less important half of intelligence.
Existing AI programs are single-purpose. They aren’t the futurist dream of an artificial general intelligence that can solve any problem and rapidly improve itself.
The more we look, the more intelligence we find in nature. Even trees are capable of communicating, sharing resources, and responding to their environment.
AI has genuine potential both to liberate humans from toil, or to allow greed and bias to run wild.
Billionaire Marc Andreessen’s Techno-Optimist Manifesto makes the case that technology is a pure blessing, that more is always better, and it shouldn’t be regulated or held back by anyone or anything. Here’s a skeptical counterpoint.